![]() ![]() 19:13:58.610 -0600 Orders.fp7 0 Rebuilding layout catalog order list: custom 19:13:58.575 -0600 Orders.fp7 0 Rebuilding layout catalog order list: name ![]() ![]() 19:13:58.571 -0600 Orders.fp7 0 Rebuilding layout catalog order list: quick reference Admitted, it may be some work to do so, especially on a complicated layout.īut nevertheless if you don't follow this procedure, the file works just as well in FM 11. To avoid this error message in the Recover.log, go to the layout in question, select one group after the other, ungroup and regroup again, which automatically corrects the dimensions of the group. The background for this message is that a group of layout elements as a whole does not exactly match the extension of the individual elements. Whenever you read "Rebuilt group with X object(s)." you may ignore it. One of the most frequent errors reported are related to layouts. ![]() 19:09:37.109 -0600 Orders.fp7 0 Completed copy or rebuild of file blocks 19:06:24.539 -0600 Orders.fp7 0 Scanning blocks and rebuilding file. The colums to the left are: date (ISO format), process time up to the millisecond, offset from Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), the filename, a recover error code, and some explanetory text, like the filename and the number of pages within the file (1 page = 4096 bytes). The "no error" parts have been stripped out to concentrate on the errors: Remember, this is work in progress and any comments are welcome. To shed some light on it I set up this page. Unfortunately a detailled explanation of all the entries is still missing. But Recover of a file with an unknown state produces a Recover.log that may contain valuable information about the file. Recovering is a very rigid process and you can't tell exactly what parts of a file may have been removed due to errors in the structure. To make it clear: you should not use a recovered file. We have tried imports of data, custom functions, etc, but found double entry the most reliable method following a change management procedure.ĭepending on your application, it maybe possible to implement the data separation model, however I would need to understand the scenario to advise this."What's the meaning of all these log entries? What to do?" Does it tell me more than "The File is Damaged", maybe something useful? Something I have long requested for re-usability, but unfortunately the only method to consistently share features is to manually implement them into a file. Opening two or more same/similar solutions in the same FileMaker Pro client can cause confusion and caution should be taken.įileMaker is not as modular as OOP applications. Replication is possible with a FileMaker solution, however this will obviously generate identical solutions. Deleting scripts in a database to import new scripts will lose assoication with the object set-up to trigger the script. There is no way to share selected attributes of one FileMaker solution, with another. Correct, it is possible to import Scripts into a FileMaker solution. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |